Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric Prodon vs Patrik Rosenholm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Prodon vs Rosenholm analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric Prodon vs Patrik Rosenholm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Prodon 1 - 0 Rosenholm
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Prodon has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rosenholm has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Prodon, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosenholm has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Prodon has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rosenholm has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Prodon has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rosenholm winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Prodon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 415/ 209), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Rosenholm has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 124/ 78), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 58/ 53).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Prodon winning 1 times and Rosenholm being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Prodon winning 2 and Rosenholm winning 0. The last match between Prodon and Rosenholm was at the Tampere Challenger, 27-07-2012, Quarterfinals, Clay with Eric Prodon getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Prodon and Rosenholm have played a deciding set 0 times, with Prodon winning 0 times and Rosenholm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Prodon winning 0, and Rosenholm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Prodon has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rosenholm has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Prodon has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rosenholm has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Prodon has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rosenholm has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
83
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
350
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
64% (432-241)
Career Total W/L
57% (249-189)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$42,020
Career Prize Money
$14,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Eric Prodon vs Patrik Rosenholm For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Prodon VS Rosenholm
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Eric Prodon | Patrik Rosenholm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:48:18 | 0:48:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 61% (25/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (24/29) | 32% (8/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 38% (6/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (27/41) | 27% (12/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Eric Prodon
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric Prodon | Patrik Rosenholm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Eric Prodon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Eric Prodon
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Eric Prodon
Player
Gerald Melzer
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
59%
(
81 of
137)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
60 of
137)
134
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 6-1 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Prodon
Player
Farrukh Dustov
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| F | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Patrik Rosenholm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Semjan
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
4
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
9
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
35 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Toby Martin
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
77%
(
10 of
13)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
17
Total Points Won
6
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Pancaldi
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
2
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-3 3-1 def. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Albano Olivetti
75%
(
89 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
3
Aces
28
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
54 of
59)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
31 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
19%
(
20 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Appelgren
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
35 of
38)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thibault Venturino
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
6
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Andres Ariel Fernandez Lopez
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4%
(
1 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Patrik Rosenholm
51%
(
43 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
6
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Prodon Vs Rosenholm Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Prodon are available here and Rosenholm photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
